Methods of thought which claim to give the lead to our world in the name of revolution have become, in reality, ideologies of consent and not of rebellion.
In order to exist, man must rebel, but rebellion must respect the limit it discovers in itself – a limit where minds meet and, in meeting, begin to exist.
In almost any revolt the leaders would tend to be people who could pronounce their aitches.
I draw from the absurd three consequences, which are my revolt, my freedom, and my passion.
Every act of rebellion expresses a nostalgia for innocence and an appeal to the essence of being.